Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:23:01 -0800 (PST) From: opentrax@email.com To: jedgar@fxp.org Cc: dima@unixfreak.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docs/24364: I don't think so! Message-ID: <200101161823.KAA02292@spammie.svbug.com> In-Reply-To: <20010116080918.A66321@peitho.fxp.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16 Jan, Chris Faulhaber wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 04:55:49AM -0800, opentrax@email.com wrote: >> Actually the "named_flags" are now in /etc/default/rc.conf, >> so the documentation is incorrect in that we don't say where >> "default rc" is. That is, one could assume 'default rc' to mean >> the 'rc' that ships with the system. That is how I read it. >> However, it *now* means the 'rc' in '/etc/'default' >> It's a very minor doc'ing error, I should have caught it. >> (Good work. Roelof. :-)) >> > > No, 'default rc' != default rc.conf. And /etc/defaults/rc.conf > (not /etc/default/rc.conf) is well documented in rc.conf(5) > Oops.... Typo on my part. I meant to say rc.conf not rc. AND defaults not default. Thanks for catching that correction, Chris. Jessem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101161823.KAA02292>