Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:05:16 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240054] audio/linux-c7-openal-soft: Add missing 32-bit libraries Message-ID: <bug-240054-4077-Fbd7wJWuuz@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-240054-4077@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-240054-4077@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240054 --- Comment #2 from Hannes Hauswedell <h2+fbsdports@fsfe.org> --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #1) Thank you for looking into this and sorry for the incomplete description. Y= our updated description of the problem is absolutely correct. I don't fully comprehend which package sites are chosen when (seems to be a mixture of CentOS and fedora), but it seems like you are right and there is= no official openal-soft package for i686. I found this package which seems to work: https://centos.pkgs.org/7/harbottle-wine32-x86_64/openal-soft-1.16.0-3.el7.= i686.rpm.html But I can't double check because the game that needs it has other issues. A= lso I don't know what the policy is on including packages from inofficial repos. In general, it's been a while for me working with bugzilla so sorry if I get some things wrong. I want to re-evaluate whether I can get rid of the linux-dualboot now. In general I am testing quite a few games with linux-c7. What is the procedure for problems I find? Should I report each individual = game or should I try to aggregate similar looking problems into individual repor= ts? I can make all games available to maintainers for debugging if you e-mail m= e :) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-240054-4077-Fbd7wJWuuz>