Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 14:28:14 -0500 (EST) From: spork <spork@super-g.com> To: Duncan Barclay <dmlb@ragnet.demon.co.uk> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS thoughts Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.00.9812141424560.19189-100000@super-g.inch.com> In-Reply-To: <199812141635.IAA10419@mailgate.cadence.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 Dec 1998, Duncan Barclay wrote: > I wonder, do you see the retuned IP address to be the IP address of > the first up network interface? If so this is due to the portmapper > (I think) binding to the first IP interface it finds which is marked > up. I'm not sure if it works differently, but I'm using Wietse's "secure" portmapper replacement. I grabbed it so I could put acls on portmap, but I do have two interfaces and it always seems to grab the right one... Charles > > Try using NFS with point-to-point interface set upand ifconfig'd on > the parallel port but nothing on the other end but. Probe the > parallel port before any of the NICs and watch things fall over... > > Duncan > > PS. Of course, this may have been fixed, but it was a problem about > 9months ago when I was playing with a laptop.;-) > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.00.9812141424560.19189-100000>