Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 05:25:43 -0700 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: hsu@cs.hut.fi, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-current@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: pci bus and current?? Message-ID: <199509181226.FAA03560@corbin.Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 18 Sep 95 21:28:53 %2B1000." <199509181128.VAA21483@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>(How to make buffers larger to catch more of the messages in dmesg?) > >>Sep 17 02:30:12 router /kernel: 32(ffffff80) >>Sep 17 02:30:12 router /kernel: map(24): mem32(ffffff80) >>Sep 17 02:30:13 router /kernel: pci0:14: vendor=0xff80, device=0xffff [no driver >> assigned] >>... > >You would need an 8MB buffer :-). > >>Sep 17 02:30:23 router /kernel: bpf: ds0 attached >>Sep 17 02:30:23 router /kernel: bpf: lo0 attached >>Sep 17 02:30:23 router /kernel: bpf: ppp0 attached >>... >>Sep 17 02:30:29 router /kernel: bpf: ppp31 attached >>Sep 17 02:30:29 router /kernel: bpf: sl0 attached >>... >>Sep 17 02:30:30 router /kernel: bpf: sl15 attached >>Sep 17 02:30:30 router /kernel: bpf: tun0 attached >>... >>Sep 17 02:30:33 router /kernel: bpf: tun31 attached > >There are too man bpf messages and not enough messages for the individual >pseudo-devices. I think we should kill the "bpf: xxn attached" messages completely. I know I'm not alone in this thinking... -DG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509181226.FAA03560>