Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 16:49:39 -0600 From: Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com> To: Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenVPN vs IPSec Message-ID: <DA2E8B42-FE1E-4950-83ED-D6179C427DA3@netgate.com> In-Reply-To: <20171118165842.GA73810@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> References: <20171118165842.GA73810@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Performance is better with IPsec. It=E2=80=99s a standard, too.=20 > On Nov 18, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su> wrote: >=20 > Dear Colleagues, >=20 > Is there any reason to prefer IPSec over OpenVPN for building VPNs > between FreeBSD hosts and routers (and others compatible with OpenVPN > like pfSense, OpenWRT etc)? >=20 > I can see only advantages of OpenVPN (a single UDP port, a single > userland daemon, no kernel rebuild required, a standard PKI, an easy > way to push settings and routes to remote clients, nice monitoring > feature etc). But maybe there is some huge advantage of IPSec I've > skipped? >=20 > --=20 > Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN > AS43859 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DA2E8B42-FE1E-4950-83ED-D6179C427DA3>