Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 Nov 2000 23:37:45 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        nate@yogotech.com
Cc:        tlambert@primenet.com (Terry Lambert), chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Turning on debugging in GENERIC
Message-ID:  <200011162337.QAA04772@usr08.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <200011162327.QAA17347@nomad.yogotech.com> from "Nate Williams" at Nov 16, 2000 04:27:58 PM

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> [ Moving replies to -chat ]
> 
> > Q:	What is the root cause of the desire for increased default
> > 	diagnostics in GENERIC?
> 
> [ SNIP ]
> 
> What does this have to do with you not having the resources to dedicate
> to CVSup or build -current?  Are you going off changing the question, so
> you can be 'right' again?

No.  I ignored the majority of your post because it was wrong,
and posting a point-by-point rebuttal to -arch would have been
an inappropriate use of the forum.  It would also have been
inappropriate to try and rebut it in other than the forum in
which the post was made, so I did nothing.

As a single point rebuttal, my home connection has been and
remains ~28k, and my premise was predicated on both the fact
that I have insufficient disk space on my scratch machines
for a full tree, do not _want_ -current bits pulled into my
main tree, and can afford neither the bandwidth nor the CPU
cycles for what is frequently an iterative process of cvsup
and build world.

Your other points are equally easy to rebut.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011162337.QAA04772>