Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:09:55 +0700 From: Adam Strohl <adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com> To: Jason Leschnik <leschnik@gmail.com> Cc: Katinka <katinka@lavabit.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Are You Using FreeBSD? Message-ID: <4FC8A303.1040906@ateamsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <CAN1XHtdcFJuVXWON6DVseKDY98WoE2D3VXbrBZaYWgWv56wYOA@mail.gmail.com> References: <C480320C-0CD9-4B61-8AFB-37085C820AB7@FreeBSD.org> <4FC779C0.7020801@ohlste.in> <4FC77EAD.1090900@my.gd> <4FC78A94.8070008@ohlste.in> <4FC79136.6000205@my.gd> <4FC7B4CC.1070507@FreeBSD.org> <4FC87A60.3020102@my.gd> <4FC88827.8020003@FreeBSD.org> <4FC89726.2010601@lavabit.com> <CAN1XHtdcFJuVXWON6DVseKDY98WoE2D3VXbrBZaYWgWv56wYOA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/1/2012 18:03, Jason Leschnik wrote: > I may be totally incorrect with my above ideas, but it's what i would > like to see from FreeBSD *again*... This is the reason in the first > place most people used FreeBSD, stability/scalability/performance are > the hallmarks of FreeBSD. If we have these hard hitting numbers > released frequently it gives the dev team a good indication of how > changes reflect on performance. This is a good point and the kind of stuff that would make a, for example, great Slashdot post once finished. Of course there would be arguments but I think it would be good exposure. It certainly would be nice to have a place to point to these things vs. just saying "its more better and stabler", too. And if its not at least its acknowledged so it can be fixed.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC8A303.1040906>