Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:09:55 +0700 From: Adam Strohl <adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com> To: Jason Leschnik <leschnik@gmail.com> Cc: Katinka <katinka@lavabit.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Are You Using FreeBSD? Message-ID: <4FC8A303.1040906@ateamsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <CAN1XHtdcFJuVXWON6DVseKDY98WoE2D3VXbrBZaYWgWv56wYOA@mail.gmail.com> References: <C480320C-0CD9-4B61-8AFB-37085C820AB7@FreeBSD.org> <4FC779C0.7020801@ohlste.in> <4FC77EAD.1090900@my.gd> <4FC78A94.8070008@ohlste.in> <4FC79136.6000205@my.gd> <4FC7B4CC.1070507@FreeBSD.org> <4FC87A60.3020102@my.gd> <4FC88827.8020003@FreeBSD.org> <4FC89726.2010601@lavabit.com> <CAN1XHtdcFJuVXWON6DVseKDY98WoE2D3VXbrBZaYWgWv56wYOA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/1/2012 18:03, Jason Leschnik wrote: > I may be totally incorrect with my above ideas, but it's what i would > like to see from FreeBSD *again*... This is the reason in the first > place most people used FreeBSD, stability/scalability/performance are > the hallmarks of FreeBSD. If we have these hard hitting numbers > released frequently it gives the dev team a good indication of how > changes reflect on performance. This is a good point and the kind of stuff that would make a, for=20 example, great Slashdot post once finished. Of course there would be arguments but I think it would be good=20 exposure. It certainly would be nice to have a place to point to these=20 things vs. just saying "its more better and stabler", too. And if its=20 not at least its acknowledged so it can be fixed.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC8A303.1040906>