Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:00:51 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com> To: blaine <blaine@denverweb.net> Cc: "Gooderum, Mark" <mark@JUMPWEB.COM>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nuking "unsafe" protocols (was Re: Upcoming rc.conf changes not loading certain currently loaded daemons) Message-ID: <20000824180051.D57333@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <39A59992.F42F03EC@denverweb.net>; from blaine@denverweb.net on Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 03:54:26PM -0600 References: <251BF6012D6B4A49A4109B1C3289A7B5BB78@purgatory.jumpweb.com> <39A59992.F42F03EC@denverweb.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 03:54:26PM -0600, blaine wrote:
> Umm, why not just use openbsd if security is the primary concern?
Because no operating system overcomes stupidity.
If you do insecure things, you have an insecure machine. If you do
secure things, you'll have a reasonably secure machine.
People put too much stock in marketing.
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000824180051.D57333>