Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 13:46:08 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabext Message-ID: <425AB7E0.2030101@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <425A3579.2138.171B7898@localhost> References: <425A32C8.30080.1710F6F5@localhost> <425A3579.2138.171B7898@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Langille wrote: > On 11 Apr 2005 at 15:23, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > >>On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:18:16 -0400 >>"Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> wrote: >> >> >>>On 11 Apr 2005 at 8:04, David E. O'Brien wrote: >>> >>> >>>>obrien 2005-04-11 08:04:41 UTC >>>> >>>> FreeBSD ports repository >>> >>>FreshPorts tells me that these ports were broken by this commit: >> >> [ ... ] >> >>Next time I won't bother to make a list then :) >> >>flz has fixed a few, but pav suggest that the obrien might want to >>back-out the commit so he won't fix more of them until obrien decides. > > > FreshPorts does a sanity check for each port in a commit. Any > failures are emailed to the comitter if the comitter opts in. To opt > in, register using your @FreeBSD.org email address at > http://www.freshports.org/ > > Is there any value in making sanity test failures publicly available? I believe emphatically that the sanity tests should be non-optional. The FreshPorts sanity checks have never been wrong for me... I personally think that every FreshPorts sanity check failure should be automatically sent to both the committer and the ports@ mailing list. If the committer doesn't wish to receive those emails, he can either (a) stop making bad commits, or (b) add a procmail filter. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?425AB7E0.2030101>