Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:55:12 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Matt Douhan <matt@fruitsalad.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why? Message-ID: <20040810185449.U776@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <200408102346.43712.matt@fruitsalad.org> References: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org> <20040810212443.GA37803@oberon.aif.ru> <200408102346.43712.matt@fruitsalad.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Matt Douhan wrote: > On Tuesday 10 August 2004 23.44, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Spartak Radchenko wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:37:28PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >>>> I have 5 servers sitting on a Linksys 10/100 switch ... 4 of the 5 are >>>> running fxp0 ethernet, while the 5th is running em ... and the 5th >>>> performs atrociously: >>>> >>>> neptune# netstat -ni | head >>>> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts >>>> Oerrs Coll >>>> em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:1b:2e 36915965 10306 28888840 1 >>>> 10858513 >>> >>> I have no problems with em: >>>> netstat -ni | head >>> >>> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs >>> Coll em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:46:98 1859370761 0 1709686290 >>> 0 0 >>> >>>> uname -rs >>> >>> FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p3 >> >> Against what type of switch? >> > > Probably a linksys judging from his first line in the email Actually, my post mentioned the Linksys ... is Spartak running the same? :) ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040810185449.U776>