Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 15:14:21 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVS removal from the base Message-ID: <201112111414.pBBEELL6064329@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:00:18 PST." <4ED974A2.7080606@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton wrote: > On 12/02/2011 04:35, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > I think you're missing the point a little. > > > > The point is, you have to keep in mind how comfortable people feel > > about things, and progress sometimes makes people uncomfortable. I > > think you should leave these changes bake for a while and let people > > get comfortable with the changing status quo. > > The fact that we have so many people who are radically change-averse, no > matter how rational the change; is a bug, not a feature. > > This particular bug is complicated dramatically by the fact that the > majority view seems to lean heavily towards "If I use it, it must be the > default and/or in the base" rather than seeing ports as part of the > overall operating SYSTEM. BSD is more conservative. More value given to stability of availability of interfaces & tools etc, More Long term professionals. Doug's attempting to force working FreeBSD ports such as procmail to be discarded is deplorable. Doug should stop coercing FreeBSD toward a Linux model, & move himself to Linux. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201112111414.pBBEELL6064329>