Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:52:38 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net> To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, sandman@hub.org, samba@samba.org Subject: Re: Linux vs NT: a new test Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990628205145.14320U-100000@cygnus.rush.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906282205510.36396-100000@thelab.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > Don't know how many ppl saw/read the following: > > http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,1015266,00.html > > One of the comments on Slashdot was the question as to how well 4.4lite > would have done in the same tests, as they "theorize" that alot of the > problems revolve around Linux's IP stack... > > Now if only we had a working MMAP, we'd be all set... Do you have any URLs or tests that show the flaws in FreeBSD's mmap? Just interested to know what they are. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990628205145.14320U-100000>