Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:25:39 +0000 From: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, john@jnielsen.net Subject: Re: ggated vs iscsi Message-ID: <E1JXfO7-0000Og-UP@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> In-Reply-To: <200803061914.28851.john@jnielsen.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Last time I used it the iscsi-target port had some significant bugs, but > looking through cvs it looks like those may have been addressed. I can't > really speak to performance. Reliability should be all right as long as > you don't have frequent network issues. Thanks for the warning - do you have any refernces for these bugs ? I have been using the iscsi-target for a while and never come across anything problematic, but I havent really hammered it hard as yet. Am currently playing around with using gmirror on a pair of iscsi drives mounted using iscsi_initiator/iscsi-target and it seems to work rather nicely actually. Reconnest if I disconnect a drive, performance is O.K., and it appears to behave itself. I would rather use ZFS on top, but I am not sure I *quite* trust it yet after some of the comments on here and my own expeineces, so gmirror it is for now. -pete.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1JXfO7-0000Og-UP>