Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 01:29:50 -0600 From: Paul Querna <chip@force-elite.com> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 2.0 -> 2.2 Message-ID: <1094369391.29415.42.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <40632F58270859A8563CA1F3@nescarba.in.t-online.fr> References: <1094364149.29415.38.camel@localhost> <40632F58270859A8563CA1F3@nescarba.in.t-online.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 09:20 +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +-le 05/09/2004 00:02 -0600, Paul Querna écrivait : > | I don't believe any plans are 100% set in stone yet, but many of the > | committers(including me) from Apache would like to make a new stable 2.2 > | branch this fall. (Likely during ApacheCon, November 13-17). > | > | This release has lots of cool new features (And, I don't want to write a > | summary document right now...), but my main question is for the FreeBSD > | Ports, will you shift the main Apache2 port to the 2.2 branch, or will > | you create a separate httpd-2.2 port? > | > | I don't want to even imply switching over on the 2.2.0 release day, but > | what is the general plan for FreeBSD? > > If apache 2.2 is a stable release, I think that apache2 will be copied to > apache20 so that people can use it still, and apache2 will be updated to the > 2.2 branch. > Yes, it will be a 'stable' release. For all 2.X.Y Releases HTTPd will use the even/odd minor numbers to indicate the stable branch. eg: 2.0.XX = stable 2.1.XX = development 2.2.XX = stable 2.3.XX = development ... etc -Paul Querna
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1094369391.29415.42.camel>