Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:15:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@world.std.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices Message-ID: <200010061715.NAA17228@world.std.com> References: <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> <14812.58143.609625.133015@hip186.ch.intel.com> <A0E035400B00D4118F9E0008C70D4D77A88A@ITC1> <200010051637.KAA51557@harmony.village.org> <200010060408.WAA05189@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 6 13:04:01 2000
>To: Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@world.std.com>
>Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices
>Cc: John Reynolds~ <jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
>Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 10:59:57 -0600
>From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
>
>: >Given THAT information does anybody have any further clues?
>: >Again, this machine is an Abit BP6, two Linksys Ether16 ISA
>: >NICs. Kernel config for them is:
>: >
>: > device ed0 at isa? port 0x2c0 irq 15 iomem 0xd8000
>:
>: Can this card (ed0) go to a different IRQ? Is that IRQ
>: disabled/reassigned (from PCI) in the BIOS/setup?
>
>Maybe that's where we should look. Does the ata probe for
>the slave somehow fail to release irq 15?
>
>The hardware config is fine (I've been over it in private
>email sevearl times).
Ah, ok... :)
>: > device ed1 at isa? port 0x340 irq 9 iomem 0xd8000
>:
>: I might want to "move" this one, too; IRQ 9 is the "shared"
>: one & it has always "frightened" me some... :)
>
>IRQ 9 is fine. Nothing wrong with it. It isn't shared at
>all. It used to be irq 2, but that's now used for chaining.
^^^^^^^^
That's the word I was looking for... :)
>Warner
Thanks,
-kc
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010061715.NAA17228>