Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 20:29:24 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/ipfw ipfw.c src/sys/netinet ip_fw.c ip_fw.h Message-ID: <20001005202924.A63643@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <200010020303.UAA99196@freefall.freebsd.org>; from billf@FreeBSD.org on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 08:03:31PM -0700 References: <200010020303.UAA99196@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 08:03:31PM -0700, Bill Fumerola wrote: > billf 2000/10/01 20:03:31 PDT > > Modified files: > sbin/ipfw ipfw.c > sys/netinet ip_fw.c ip_fw.h > Log: > Add new fields for more granularity: > IP: version, tos, ttl, len, id > TCP: seq#, ack#, window size > What is the purpose of having the following modifiers? - ipversion (ipfw will only be passed IPv4 packets) - ipid - tcpseq - tcpack How these can be really useful? I think they should be dropped. The current implementation of iplen, ipttl and tcpwin modifiers does not seem interesting, because comparison is only limited to equality. I think they should be modified to accept the range of values, specified by lowest and highest boundaries, so one could specify `iplen 20-50' (20 <= iplen <= 50), `ipttl 0-5' (ipttl <= 5), etc. <PS> Bill, I have finished updating the manual, but do not want to commit the change before you answer my questions above. </PS> -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001005202924.A63643>