Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 16:09:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: JG <amd64list@jpgsworld.com> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is MySQL nearly twice as fast on Linux? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10405231604190.711-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20040523100537.014613a8@mail.ojoink.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 23 May 2004, JG wrote: > > > >None consolidated in the same post with the same versions > >of FreeBSD and mysql. Like I said before, there are a ton > >of posts on amd64@ and some here on threads@. It would > >help much if you were to summarize them on a web page so > >that all of us don't have to go searching through all > >the archives trying to do it ourselves. > > Good idea, I'll do that now. > > > The default configuration with > >libpthread vs FreeBSD-linuxthreads seems to be similar. > > I would disagree from what I've seen so far. Nothing came > close to the remote tests using Linuxthreads. But I don't see how using network connections vs domain socket (is that what local uses?) affects a threading library. And if you compare FreeBSD linuxthreads to native linuxthreads, it still isn't close which still shows to me that it is the kernel. -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10405231604190.711-100000>