Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 23:55:41 -0700 From: Mark Millard via freebsd-bugs <freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Python 37/38 conflict, was Re: Trubles compiling lxqt on RPi4" [really: list interface replacement generates bad textual content] Message-ID: <3AF15926-17A0-4577-A673-AC35BE64BA7B@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <64429369-4010-4c99-888b-3460d9d9141e@FreeBSD.org> References: <1120D222-A28B-447B-9121-726BC8F49A7F@yahoo.com> <20210514210922.ygmuc3oigzd4ogi3@aniel.nours.eu> <9788E8D6-199E-4F48-89DA-F784BCC0CADF@yahoo.com> <5deb443a-316f-46b8-ada2-7f66893b5ffa@FreeBSD.org> <8AFC5AD7-8F1F-4980-BB26-62038380946E@yahoo.com> <03DFF722-0473-4306-B1C4-123DBF15B955@yahoo.com> <D34C4B97-C636-445E-87DB-5AA26438D912@yahoo.com> <c2022060-26b0-49b2-b2c3-416124b17937@FreeBSD.org> <9B7D4B8B-DD04-4119-8B80-548466D4F063@yahoo.com> <64429369-4010-4c99-888b-3460d9d9141e@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 2021-May-17, at 23:37, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt at FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > 18 mai 2021 06:50:03 Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>: > >> On 2021-May-15, at 22:22, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> >> >>> 16 mai 2021 05:29:07 Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>: >>> >>>> In exploring I've seen various web-page presentation of >>>> freebsd-bugs messages that seem to be messed up. An >>>> example is: >>>> >>>> . . . >>> >>> Nice catch, I will fix it >>> >> >> The extra text disappeared when I later looked at the >> pages via the URLs. >> >> But I've run into another oddity. I did a google >> search for: >> >> "Comparing the OverDrive 1000 (A57) vs. MACCHIATObin" >> >> and then used the 1st link shown, the one from the text: >> >> QUOTE >> https://lists.freebsd.org › freebsd-arm › 2019-December >> Comparing the OverDrive 1000 (A57) vs. MACCHIATObin ... >> Dec 2, 2019 — Comparing the OverDrive 1000 (A57) vs. MACCHIATObin Double Shot (A72) for buildworld and via a CPU/cache/RAM tradeoff-exploring ... >> END QUOTE >> >> which has the link (it is for one of my old messages): >> >> https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiPhp3OtdLwAhVH6Z4KHaXQC68QFjAAegQIAxAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freebsd.org%2Fpipermail%2Ffreebsd-arm%2F2019-December%2F020854.html&usg=AOvVaw2VHrNUGc-Vce4CjAmTufxq >> >> Or, extracting/converting the relevant part of that text: >> >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2019-December/020854.html >> >> This now takes me to the wrong message on the list, one titled: >> >> Re: 64 bit ARM systems with more than four cores Ed Maste >> >> Turns out that the my old message now shows up as 2 later >> by number (020854 -> 020856): >> >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2019-December/020856.html >> >> gets to the message with the correct title. >> >> It appears that the numbering has not been preserved >> in the conversion. This can make google search results >> that point into the (older) freebsd lists >> problematical. >> >> >> === >> Mark Millard >> marklmi at yahoo.com >> ( dsl-only.net went >> away in early 2018-Mar) > > 99.9% of the tume the numbering is preserved, sometimes it is not given the weirdness of the things that happened in the past. i will dig into this specific case to see what I can do. But don t expect much here. > FYI: In my "binary search inspired" looking around everything I looked at that was old but more recent than 2014-Dec-23 had the offset of 2. Everything older than 2014-Dec-10 worked. Those dates are as close together as I got. (Finding things that have useful google search matches in a time frame is messy so the results are limited. It would be nice to find a better way to looking up old references.) Example: "lsof on FreeBSD/arm" goggle search click through to page vs.: Tuesday, 23 December 2014 . . . • Re: lsof on FreeBSD/arm Larry Rosenman • [Differential] [Commented On] D1317: Build gperf as a dependency before gcc for arm releases emaste (Ed Maste) • [Differential] [Updated, 8 lines] D1317: Build gperf as a dependency before gcc for arm releases emaste (Ed Maste) It gets on to the message for last line (still off by two for the number, like what I reported already): By contrast: "watchdogd not working anymore (since r273154+)" google search click through vs.: Wednesday, 10 December 2014 . . . • Re: RPi - watchdogd not working anymore (since r273154+) Andreas Schwarz worked. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AF15926-17A0-4577-A673-AC35BE64BA7B>