Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 08:59:55 -0800 From: "Matthew Jacob" <lydianconcepts@gmail.com> To: "Eduardo Meyer" <dudu.meyer@gmail.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with QLogic FC problem diagnosis (da0:isp0:0:0:0): lost device Message-ID: <7579f7fb0702050859k42c5e12h3a3f1e46793ca4f0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <d3ea75b30702050804m4123e179yfdb8e8dda19351b9@mail.gmail.com> References: <d3ea75b30702050431q14c09476q8159decf87446402@mail.gmail.com> <7579f7fb0702050800x3b9fbc86j2908a2ee193d8713@mail.gmail.com> <d3ea75b30702050804m4123e179yfdb8e8dda19351b9@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/5/07, Eduardo Meyer <dudu.meyer@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/5/07, Matthew Jacob <lydianconcepts@gmail.com> wrote: > > Helpful information would be: > > > > a) Release > > b) Connection Topology > > > > It looks like you're going through a switch. Your short term solution > > will be to zone your box and the CX300 together excluding all else. > > > > A longer term solution is for me to MFC the new SAN evaluation code > > which is a bit less harsh. > > You are right, I am going through a switch. > It is a 6.2-STABLE as of Feb 2nd. > > Is this code scheduled to be MFC'd? > Yes, when it's got just a bit more mileage on it and I have time to monitor breakage that might occur. This is also with 24XX support. *Probably* toward the end of this month. As Wilko says, zoning is worth it unless you're explicitly sharing.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7579f7fb0702050859k42c5e12h3a3f1e46793ca4f0>