Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:56:25 +0000 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Gregory Edigarov <greg@profi.kharkov.ua> Subject: Re: altq in main tree? Message-ID: <200404211456.34624.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <20040421114802.GA4820@profi.kharkov.ua> References: <20040421114802.GA4820@profi.kharkov.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_iuohAobydf7l1mH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 21 April 2004 11:48, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > I just wonder if there are any chances that altq will be in the main > tree in the near future? I work on altq integration on and off for a couple of weeks, yet the outcom= e=20 is unclear as the required locking for altq is not exactly easy to do. But = as=20 vital locking is a must-do item for any new subsystem these days, we will=20 have to see how it works out. Also there are some other items on my schedule which must be complete=20 beforehand. =2D-=20 Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet --Boundary-02=_iuohAobydf7l1mH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAhouiXyyEoT62BG0RApXDAJ9zajFOkwUoBENsbnazwQXWhQ5NEQCdH3au zYZbMq/lv10ERRfR7OpHhQk= =KZIf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_iuohAobydf7l1mH--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404211456.34624.max>