Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 04:40:50 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD Message-ID: <71B7DEC2-1ABE-4333-8C8E-02F899D2449B@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <20100531095617.GR83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20100529130240.GA99732@freebsd.org> <20100530135859.GI83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <508DA8CE-749A-46B4-AF0B-392DB08CBBCD@samsco.org> <20100531095617.GR83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On May 31, 2010, at 3:56 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > My personal opinion is that pushing the import now at the present state > of clang makes a disservice to FreeBSD, and possible clang. Why not keep > the glue on the branch as it is ? Motivated testers willing to help > definitely can checkout from the branch. Import can happen when we are > satisfied with the quality of new compiler, instead of discontent about > old one. Who is "we", and what is their criteria? Are you speaking for the entire FreeBSD project? Scotthome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?71B7DEC2-1ABE-4333-8C8E-02F899D2449B>