Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 00:15:47 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, rcramer@sytex.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Final upgrades of tools in 2.2-STABLE (Re: Sendmail 8.9.1a ) Message-ID: <199812310715.AAA08070@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199812310654.OAA89915@spinner.netplex.com.au> References: <3.0.5.32.19981230194536.01b10900@granite.sentex.ca> <199812310654.OAA89915@spinner.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ 2.2-stable ] > Well, I've been debating whether to bring up the issue of doing a couple > of "final" major updates to certain components. > > In particular: > - sendmail 8.9.1(a) > - bind 8.1.2 > - ipfw forward (transparent proxy support for ipfw). > > On one hand, sendmail and bind8 are pretty much expected for line-of-fire > systems, and their import won't mess up a subsequent official release. It > will make life a bit easier for folks trying to use 2.2 systems in this > role as they will stop having to fight with the build mechanism over which > sendmail/bind it uses. > > On the other, it messes up people tracking 2.2-stable just for minor bug > fixes and probably wouldn't appreciate arriving at work in the morning and > discovering they've now got to reconfigure sendmail and bind and that ipfw > now gives parameter size errors. I'd say gofer it. I for one have *NO* plans on upgrading any mission-critical boxes to 3.0, simply because I'm not convinced it's got enough milage under it, so I'm sticking with 2.2. It's nicer to have things 'officially', plus it's trivial to not do a 'make world' to upgrade if you don't want to mess with all of the new features, and instead take them piecemeal. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812310715.AAA08070>