Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 09:06:13 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: "Dan Mahoney\, System Admin" <danm@prime.gushi.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maybe this is a bug, should I report it? Message-ID: <44tzmx5j8q.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <20071205013053.I89093@prime.gushi.org> (Dan Mahoney's message of "Wed\, 5 Dec 2007 01\:32\:39 -0500 \(EST\)") References: <20071205013053.I89093@prime.gushi.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <danm@prime.gushi.org> writes: > But why is it that portupgrade feels the need to upgrade gpg to gpg2, > when gpg is still in the tree? > > I'm running a portupgrade -rf gettext, and didn't previously have gpg2 > installed. security/gnupg is gpg2, and has been for about a year. gpg1 is now a separate port, and you need to make separate arrangements if you want to start using security/gnupg1 instead of security/gnupg. portupgrade has a "-o" option for this purpose.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44tzmx5j8q.fsf>