Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 02 Mar 1997 13:54:58 -0800
From:      Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
To:        Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Cc:        ejs@bfd.com (Eric J. Schwertfeger), jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) 
Message-ID:  <199703022154.NAA06808@rah.star-gate.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 02 Mar 1997 16:48:07 EST." <199703022148.QAA10985@crh.cl.msu.edu> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From The Desk Of Charles Henrich :
> >> Now if we can convince bror@sms.fi to overclock his dual pentium and get h
im
> >> the new client we may be able to beat the dual 400mhz alpha 8)
> >
> > If you check the stats page, you'll notice he just changed his listing
> > from 606k keys/sec to 676k keys/sec, so he has the updated binary.  The
> > wonders of mime attachments :-)
> 
> I see how you are Amancio!  Did you single user a nice -20 to get 396? :)
> 

Nope, I took out a few transistor that I didn't need on my PPRO 8)

No, I just recompile the binary without -m486 and added -finline-functions.

	Cheers,
	Amancio





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703022154.NAA06808>