Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:24:27 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> Subject: Re: MFC wishlist Message-ID: <20050115012427.GA51585@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <41E86F55.4030906@gmx.net> References: <41DF253C.5040705@fer.hr> <20050108005540.GB93568@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050108030707.GA3656@frontfree.net> <20050108034424.GA94365@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <41E54C51.4000300@fer.hr> <20050112164022.GD28786@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <41E553EB.10809@criticalmagic.com> <20050112172608.GB16201@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <41E86F55.4030906@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 02:18:13AM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > Steve Kargl wrote: > >On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 11:44:27AM -0500, Richard Coleman wrote: > > > >>Brooks Davis wrote: > >> > >>>No, because the project has no ability to "assign > >>>priority/resources". If someone who has is intrested and capable time > >>>to work on it, does so in time, then it may be done, if not, it > >>>won't. > >>> > >> > >>Should we take this to mean that none of the developers are interested > >>in ULE any more? That's the general feeling I get these days. Just > >>curious. > >> > > > > > >As Brooks stated, Jeff is busy. He works on it when he > >can. My problem is that system simply freezes. I can't > >get a kernel dump, so its hard to provide more info. > > The broken crashdumps are really annoying. I've been harassing people on > freebsd-stable about it before christmas (rwatson IIRC)... > This isn't a broken crash dump problem. This is either a deadlock or livelock type problem. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050115012427.GA51585>