Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Jul 2001 21:13:56 -0500
From:      Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net>
To:        "Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Regarding New FreeBSD BenchMark From Sysadmin Mag (left out a fiew tuning options)
Message-ID:  <20010712211356.D75539@bsd.havk.org>
In-Reply-To: <200107130205.f6D250Y136048@saturn.cs.uml.edu>; from acahalan@cs.uml.edu on Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 10:05:00PM -0400
References:  <200107130205.f6D250Y136048@saturn.cs.uml.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 10:05:00PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> 
> It's bad enough that a tuned FreeBSD box still collapses under load,
> while the untuned Linux box doesn't.
[snip]

Is this a troll?!  In my experience the exact opposite is true.
Of course YMMV depending on your "religious" views.

-steve

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010712211356.D75539>