Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:31:58 +0200 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> To: Alexey Shuvaev <shuvaev@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> Cc: jb@freebsd.org, John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dtrace status Message-ID: <20080919083158.GA24881@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20080919080616.GA44330@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> References: <20080917101013.GA90749@freebsd.org> <20080918211652.GB19958@what-creek.com> <20080919080616.GA44330@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:06:16AM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 09:16:52PM +0000, John Birrell wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:10:13PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > > > Dtrace was commited 3 months ago and the only things that prevents > > > using it "out of the box" is building kernel with WITH_CTF=1. > > > > > > When is this going to be enabled on default. What is preventing this > > > from happening? > > > > I wonder whether people generally want it enabled by default. > > > I am not sure for -STABLE but enabling it by default on -CURRENT might > be a good idea. yeah, definitely. I believe we want dtrace working out of the box, dont we?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080919083158.GA24881>