Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:38:56 -0700
From:      "Brian W." <brian@brianwhalen.net>
To:        Charles Owens <cowens@greatbaysoftware.com>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: mfi(4) IO performance regression, post 8.1
Message-ID:  <CADV=szWL3NbN9KM_VeAD77%2B%2BD5L7TATGmk_S2PsZeYLV0dBD7g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120615110618.4CF5F1065689@hub.freebsd.org>
References:  <20120615110618.4CF5F1065689@hub.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Curious why you are preferring i386 +PAE as opposed to amd64?
On Jun 15, 2012 4:09 AM, "Charles Owens" <cowens@greatbaysoftware.com>
wrote:

> Yes, of course. So far I can say that the major shift appears to have
> occurred between 8.1 and 8.2 .
>
> Thanks,
>
> Charles Owens
> Great Bay Software,  Inc.
>
> Sent from my phone
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@freebsd.org>
> To: "Charles Owens" <cowens@greatbaysoftware.com>
> Cc: <stable@freebsd.org>
> Subject: mfi(4) IO performance regression, post 8.1
> Date: Fri, Jun 15, 2012 1:55 am
>
>
> Hm, can you try different subversion checkouts of the kernel tree
> between 8.1 and 8.3, to pinpoint which commit(s) broke things?
>
>
>
> ADrian
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADV=szWL3NbN9KM_VeAD77%2B%2BD5L7TATGmk_S2PsZeYLV0dBD7g>