Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:38:56 -0700 From: "Brian W." <brian@brianwhalen.net> To: Charles Owens <cowens@greatbaysoftware.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: mfi(4) IO performance regression, post 8.1 Message-ID: <CADV=szWL3NbN9KM_VeAD77%2B%2BD5L7TATGmk_S2PsZeYLV0dBD7g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120615110618.4CF5F1065689@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20120615110618.4CF5F1065689@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Curious why you are preferring i386 +PAE as opposed to amd64? On Jun 15, 2012 4:09 AM, "Charles Owens" <cowens@greatbaysoftware.com> wrote: > Yes, of course. So far I can say that the major shift appears to have > occurred between 8.1 and 8.2 . > > Thanks, > > Charles Owens > Great Bay Software, Inc. > > Sent from my phone > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@freebsd.org> > To: "Charles Owens" <cowens@greatbaysoftware.com> > Cc: <stable@freebsd.org> > Subject: mfi(4) IO performance regression, post 8.1 > Date: Fri, Jun 15, 2012 1:55 am > > > Hm, can you try different subversion checkouts of the kernel tree > between 8.1 and 8.3, to pinpoint which commit(s) broke things? > > > > ADrian > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADV=szWL3NbN9KM_VeAD77%2B%2BD5L7TATGmk_S2PsZeYLV0dBD7g>