Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 00:24:36 +0200 From: Alberto Villa <avilla@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: acpi@freebsd.org, freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>, mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dell acpi_video patch Message-ID: <CAJp7RHbQ6o%2B7q_=FaG%2BQc3E=J6gxy1mexc%2BzDoBEtGcoqgGQ9g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201210191334.38712.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20121005215316.GA38707@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <201210121006.17276.jhb@freebsd.org> <CAJp7RHZ69okYaTXsqjkGX%2BOzoAZWNTNc1Qip%2BMof3DkLD0SVDA@mail.gmail.com> <201210191334.38712.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 7:34 PM, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > I considered that, but 1) it wouldn't help your laptop, and 2) the ACPI 3.0b > spec where bit 31 is added specifically states (in the Note 3 I included in > my prior e-mail) that 0x110 is the only valid legacy ID. Sure, it wasn't about my laptop, but a general consideration; also spec 5.0 lists only 0x0110, so it's better to stick to the spec as you say. By the way, I think the name of devices is not used anywhere (apart for an X.Org piece of code which I'm going to patch), so it's not important. -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer <avilla@FreeBSD.org> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJp7RHbQ6o%2B7q_=FaG%2BQc3E=J6gxy1mexc%2BzDoBEtGcoqgGQ9g>