Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 02:48:29 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <darius@dons.net.au> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> Cc: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, Boris Popov <bp@butya.kz>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NetWare client in -current Message-ID: <37D93D65.627AD43@dons.net.au> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909101118140.14497-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote: > > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be > > mount_nwfs because building it without the kernel source could be a > > problem, but the rest of it could be a port I think :) > Thats like suggesting we make the 'ipfw' command a port and leave the > kernel bits in the tree. Since all this stuff depends on being in sync, > the only reasonable way to do this is to put it in the tree. Why? What kernel code does this need? --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37D93D65.627AD43>