Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 18:26:32 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219606] aarch64: libarchive.so.6 not present, libarchive.so not equivalent @ 318898 Message-ID: <bug-219606-8-2YSfPHKm8x@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-219606-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-219606-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219606 --- Comment #4 from Phillip R. Jaenke <prj@rootwyrm.com> --- I certainly won't disagree there; it's a terrible idea. It's also what they= 're going to do, whether or not you or I like it. What's an even WORSE idea is = the fact that nothing is throwing an error here. At the MINIMUM something shoul= d be screaming. Neither libarchive nor pkg should just sit there and go 'oh, somebody did a bad symlink, I'll just corrupt silently.' That also does not address the fact that there is no possibility of having a libarchive.so.6 on aarch64 currently. Once a user goes to r318898 or later, their existing installation is going to get hosed in one way or another. At= the minimum, aarch64 needs COMPAT_FREEBSD11 to build and install libarchive.so.= 6 to prevent blowing up pkgbase. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-219606-8-2YSfPHKm8x>