Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:43:26 -0500 From: Lawrence Sica <lomion@mac.com> To: ogautherot@freesurf.fr Cc: Chip McClure <vhm3@gigguardian.com> Subject: Re: SCO Lawsuits, round 2 Message-ID: <CF40FF57-1B91-11D8-A469-000393A335A2@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20031120111512.D3A36E4A01@mail.freesurf.fr> References: <23740.216.195.235.103.1069277586.squirrel@webmail.gigguardian.com> <20031119224613.GI66785@submonkey.net> <20031119221537.O731@ganymede.hub.org> <388284A0-1B27-11D8-A469-000393A335A2@mac.com> <20031120103000.GM66785@submonkey.net> <20031120111512.D3A36E4A01@mail.freesurf.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 20, 2003, at 6:15 AM, ogautherot@freesurf.fr wrote: > > Ceri Davies =E9crit: > >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 02:00:27AM -0500, Lawrence Sica wrote: >>> On Nov 19, 2003, at 9:16 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >>>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Ceri Davies wrote: >>>> >>>>> "I agree that the more yarn you pull out the more you see," = McBride >>>>> said >>>>> during a press briefing at the inaugural Enterprise IT Week at=20 >>>>> cdXpo >>>>> Conference here. "We have enough sorted out, but we are so focused=20= >>>>> on >>>>> the [IBM litigation]. With our limited energies and what our guys=20= >>>>> are >>>>> going through, we probably won't file any suits against BSD until >>>>> sometime in the first half of next year." >>>> >>>> Um ... who is BSD? *scratch head* Or do they intend to sue = Berkeley >>>> themselves? >>> >>> The various *BSDs and Apple one must assume. Apple is probably a >>> prime target. >> >> Well Apple aren't using a BSD kernel as I understand it, so they're >> probably safe. >> >> Ceri >> >> --=20 > > Darwin (the new Apple kernel) is based on BSD so, eventually, the Mc=20= > Bride > could sue them too. > The kernel is Mach based, the userland is BSD based though. --Larry=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CF40FF57-1B91-11D8-A469-000393A335A2>