Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 02 Apr 2011 13:54:44 -0700
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Dirk Meyer <dinoex@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/netpbm Makefile
Message-ID:  <4D978D14.406@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110402155230.GA80090@magic.hamla.org>
References:  <201104021205.p32C5Y8g082718@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110402155230.GA80090@magic.hamla.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/02/2011 08:52, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 12:05:34 +0000, Dirk Meyer wrote:
>
>> dinoex      2011-04-02 12:05:34 UTC
>>
>>    FreeBSD ports repository
>>
>>    Modified files:
>>      graphics/netpbm      Makefile
>>    Log:
>>    - drop CONFLICTS with megetty
>>    Submitted by:   olgeni
>
> Does PORTREVISION need to be bumped when we change CONFLICTS?

When adding CONFLICTS I would say definitely yes, since they are 
recorded in the package. When dropping a conflict I personally would be 
less inclined to bump it, unless I knew that there was an existing 
problem that is being solved by the update.


Doug

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D978D14.406>