Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 13:54:44 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Dirk Meyer <dinoex@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/netpbm Makefile Message-ID: <4D978D14.406@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110402155230.GA80090@magic.hamla.org> References: <201104021205.p32C5Y8g082718@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110402155230.GA80090@magic.hamla.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/02/2011 08:52, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 12:05:34 +0000, Dirk Meyer wrote: > >> dinoex 2011-04-02 12:05:34 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Modified files: >> graphics/netpbm Makefile >> Log: >> - drop CONFLICTS with megetty >> Submitted by: olgeni > > Does PORTREVISION need to be bumped when we change CONFLICTS? When adding CONFLICTS I would say definitely yes, since they are recorded in the package. When dropping a conflict I personally would be less inclined to bump it, unless I knew that there was an existing problem that is being solved by the update. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D978D14.406>