Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:33:26 +0300
From:      Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/security/ssh2 pkg-plist
Message-ID:  <20010920113326.A8974@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
In-Reply-To: <20010916142112.B22230@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 02:21:12PM -0700
References:  <200109141351.f8EDpRX81320@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010914195142.A56820@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010916125446.A513@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010916142112.B22230@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 02:21:12PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 12:54:46PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> 
> > +# Include extra files if X11 is installed
> > +.if defined(WITH_X11) || (exists(${X11BASE}/lib/libX11.a) \
> > +	&& !defined(WITHOUT_X11))
> > +USE_XLIB=	yes
> > +PLIST_SUB+=	WITH_X=""
> 
> I'm not sure this is correct.  If X is installed, you can disable the
> port from building with it, but if X is not installed you can't make
> it build with X support (i.e. the WITH_X11 check is nonfunctional, I
> think).

Erm.. if you define WITH_X11, the USE_XLIB=yes will bring in a lib
dependency on the X port, no?

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
If there were no counterfactuals, this sentence would not have been paradoxical.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010920113326.A8974>