Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:51:17 -0400 From: Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org> To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/rubygem-pkg-config pkg-descr Message-ID: <20101014215117.GB34544@atarininja.org> In-Reply-To: <20101014131456.4d49bd3d.stas@FreeBSD.org> References: <201010122319.o9CNJD1A046613@repoman.freebsd.org> <20101014131456.4d49bd3d.stas@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 01:14:56PM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 23:19:13 +0000 (UTC) > Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org> mentioned: > > > swills 2010-10-12 23:19:13 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > devel/rubygem-pkg-config pkg-descr > > Log: > > - Fix WWW > > > > Approved by: wxs (co-mentor) > ^^^^^^^^^ > > This should say "mentor". I've tried to stay out of the other thread involving this, but I feel like I should speak up now. Who approved this commit is quite clear. If I'm a single mentor or have agreed to co-mentor someone is not relevant to the point that line is trying to make. Some latitude with these kinds of trivial things is better than a draconian approach to what is and is not allowed in commit messages. In all honesty, your insistence on not using 'co-mentor' is the first I've ever heard of it. I realize that doesn't make it right, but I think my point that this is a silly debate still stands. -- WXS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101014215117.GB34544>