Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:37:50 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net-im/libpurple Makefile Message-ID: <49C952AE.8080509@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090324104032.GA47617@FreeBSD.org> References: <200903240023.n2O0NVBb013624@repoman.freebsd.org> <49C84088.9020505@FreeBSD.org> <20090324021518.GC1292@atarininja.org> <49C84339.60201@FreeBSD.org> <20090324104032.GA47617@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:19:37PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> Wesley Shields wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:08:08PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >>>> Since silc is off by default (and therefore the package won't change), >>>> was this necessary? >>> There are two viewpoints to this: >>> >>> 1) The option is off by default so the package won't change, and thus >>> PORTREVISION doesn't need to be bumped. >>> >>> 2) Not bumping PORTREVISION may cause the port to misbehave if it's >>> built with old libraries. >> I don't see the logic in this. The port works just fine right now with >> the old libraries. Can you be more specific about the scenario you're >> concerned about? > > Per what I see, shlib version of libsilcclient was bumped during > devel/silc-toolkit update. Since net-im/libpurple explicitly depends on > named library, IFF you have that option enabled. It's off by default. This is one of the main reasons I'd like to propose a replacement for PORTREVISION/PORTEPOCH that can more easily be set within an optional part of the Makefile. Doug
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49C952AE.8080509>