Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:39:24 -0700 From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> To: Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/rubygem-pkg-config pkg-descr Message-ID: <20101014153924.b290bd11.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20101014215117.GB34544@atarininja.org> References: <201010122319.o9CNJD1A046613@repoman.freebsd.org> <20101014131456.4d49bd3d.stas@FreeBSD.org> <20101014215117.GB34544@atarininja.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:51:17 -0400 Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org> mentioned: > In all honesty, your insistence on not using 'co-mentor' is the first > I've ever heard of it. I realize that doesn't make it right, but I think > my point that this is a silly debate still stands. But you didn't heard that you should use 'co-mentor' either? It was meant for consistency, so you can later do some automatic processing based on "(mentor)". I don't even know where this string came from: you probably can't find any references to "approved by co-mentor" neither in the committer's guide, or in porter's handbook. I just was surpised to receive no reaction on my first comment both from the committer and the mentor: the "co-mentor" nonsense has continued to be used. Maybe I just missed that, but I didn't heard that we allow each new mentor to invent his own string to put into parenthesis; if it's true, my I'll ask my next mentee to put something like "master" or "god" in place of "mentor", just because I like it better, or nobody told me that I shouldn't do that. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101014153924.b290bd11.stas>