Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:43:15 -0500 From: Tadayuki OKADA <tadayuki.okada@windriver.com> To: Akinori MUSHA <knu@iDaemons.org> Cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.cc>, Clive Lin <clive@tongi.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/chinese/mutt Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <3C56D123.B8694352@windriver.com> References: <200201281806.g0SI6U989949@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020128181626.GA91155@malloc.eb.kliev.net> <20020128220136.GE49984@squall.waterspout.com> <20020129094005.GA11322@malloc.eb.kliev.net> <864rl5cwh5.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <20020129134125.GB47169@madman.nectar.cc> <86vgdlb2td.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Akinori MUSHA wrote:
>
> At Tue, 29 Jan 2002 07:41:25 -0600,
> Jacques A. Vidrine <n@nectar.cc> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 06:55:34PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
> > > What about doing like this:
> > >
> > > master:
> > >
> > > PORTREVISION?= 0 # master port's revision
> >
> > Isn't this redundant (it is already in bsd.port.mk)?
> >
> > > slave:
> > >
> > > PORTREVISION= 1 # slave port's revision
> > >
> > > .include "${MASTERDIR}/Makefile"
>
> Well, just to make sure I make my point clear; I simply explained how
> to give a master port and its slave ports different PORTREVISION
> values. The `?=' operator was the point.
How about extend PORTREVISION to have both master and slave revision.
for example:
MASTERREVISION=1 in master port makefile
SLAVEREVISION=3 in slave port makefile
PORTREVISION=${MASTERREVISION}.${SLAVEREVISION}
Of course we need tool side changes.
Regards,
--
Tadayuki OKADA
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C56D123.B8694352>