Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 14:13:20 -0800 (PST) From: "Steven P. Donegan" <donegan@quick.net> To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: Josh Tiefenbach <josh@ican.net>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NOW/MOSIX/Beowulf Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.981230141010.23928C-100000@oldnews.quick.net> In-Reply-To: <199812302055.MAA05735@dingo.cdrom.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> > Cool; thanks for the review. Anyone else using either the Netscape > server or experimenting with the OpenLDAP implementation are invited to > speak up; this sort of input's really useful. > I 'vampired' my corporate LDAP directory (roughly 15k entries) and populated a FreeBSD and Netscape system with it (FreeBSD was the ldap in the ports directory). Both systems were basically identical as far as hardware goes. The FreeBSD response to queries was roughly twice as fast as the Netscape under NT. Since the database was very small (5 meg or so) I would see no reason why this couldn't scale indefinitely... (round robin DNS or Cisco load director etc.). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the messagehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.91.981230141010.23928C-100000>