Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:26:27 +0400 From: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, rwatson@freebsd.org, kmacy@freebsd.org, Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v Message-ID: <k%2B9khAZnafPFfFU0wKmc9RlPP/Y@j4OYE6OL8eALCd4BvSxIfwgoxSc> In-Reply-To: <Rj7Fi0Uz71tB6gaY5wX5iV4Wqak@XX1fo6zQUfC4h0jjRC6IBz3oNH4> References: <20090602222445.2F6017302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20090603194453.GA43137@alchemy.franken.de> <k2BOEYfMcn9Q2wvaWZK0dLZVLhc@BpFm1zkZmHABxHH1eUOcQSRoWTc> <200906040802.27057.jhb@freebsd.org> <Rj7Fi0Uz71tB6gaY5wX5iV4Wqak@XX1fo6zQUfC4h0jjRC6IBz3oNH4>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John, good day.
Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:29:56AM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 08:02:25AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 June 2009 11:26:17 pm Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> > > Yes, seems like so. John, may be we can eliminate the only reference to
> > > KTR_PERCPU from sys/sys/pcpu.h? Both 'struct pcpu' fields seem to be
> > > unused (grep'ped -CURRENT sources).
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Fine. Then the attached patch should remove the stuff.
Could the mentioned KTR_PERCPU stuff be removed or you think that
it is better to leave it "as is"?
Thanks!
--
Eygene
_ ___ _.--. #
\`.|\..----...-'` `-._.-'_.-'` # Remember that it is hard
/ ' ` , __.--' # to read the on-line manual
)/' _/ \ `-_, / # while single-stepping the kernel.
`-'" `"\_ ,_.-;_.-\_ ', fsc/as #
_.-'_./ {_.' ; / # -- FreeBSD Developers handbook
{_.-``-' {_/ #
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?k%2B9khAZnafPFfFU0wKmc9RlPP/Y>