Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:00:36 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 Message-ID: <20131029130036.GH52889@glebius.int.ru> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1310291248570.4210@ai.fobar.qr> References: <201310290652.r9T6qYNw059983@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20131029095721.GU52889@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1310291248570.4210@ai.fobar.qr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:55:57PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: B> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: B> B> > Bjoern, B> > B> > in r256868 you said that now netback compiles w/o INET. B> B> So it had for ages according to the tinderbox with all LINT kernels, B> and it had after my change. Well, I added it to LINT only yesterday :) B> My change just also allowed a GENERIC to compile without INET as well B> (I think someone forgot to add things to NOTES and only added them to B> GENERIC but I did not get around to check that, as otherwise the B> tinderbox would have found this ages ago). B> B> The below is a NOIP kernel, which is an aditional step to no INET (in B> which case I still had INET6 support). B> I hadn't cared about NOIP, but, as said had been ok with the tinderbox B> for a long time. So something else changed since, or something else B> had been broken all the time and another change now revealed it? Yes, see above :) B> I guess it lacks #ifdef INET6 and #include "opt_inet6.h" throughout B> the file? My guess that entire function that processes packet for checksumming needs to be disabled. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131029130036.GH52889>