Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:53:14 -0500 (EST) From: Jay Kuri <jay@oneway.com> To: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@imach.com> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of Union Filesystem Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102131651080.81538-100000@daedal.oneway.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102131350580.2911-100000@workhorse.iMach.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The UNION filesystem is NOT what I was thinking it was....
>
> Don't know where the heck I got the idea that the Union Filesystem
> permitted a fs to span multiple disks.
Probably from the name. =) but yeah... It's the overlapping
filesystem type thing I'm interested in. I keep seeing people say 'I use
it for xy.' but those warnings are mighty scary.
Jay
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
UNIX: because reboots are for hardware upgrades
Jay Kuri jay@oneway.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0102131651080.81538-100000>