Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Jun 2022 14:06:24 +0200
From:      Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>, Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org>, Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Reducing SIGINFO verbosity
Message-ID:  <20220619140624.21263e46@bsd64.grem.de>
In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfoJPB=-WMqH_Hd5ggGmY4GR2L7RJZpa_e9a2_ym5R4ZZA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20210520180155.3e23500e@bsd64.grem.de> <20210520185917.GL14975@funkthat.com> <CAG6CVpWpDYid9F0fSWyyFVuh6SuNmV4HwEBQUKTCXDGfq6KwAw@mail.gmail.com> <YKe3coCxotoKBV0T@submonkey.net> <CANCZdfoJPB=-WMqH_Hd5ggGmY4GR2L7RJZpa_e9a2_ym5R4ZZA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Fri, 21 May 2021 08:36:49 -0600
Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 7:38 AM Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>
> wrote:
>=20
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:57:17PM -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote: =20
> > > No, I don=E2=80=99t think there=E2=80=99s any reason to default it di=
fferently on
> > > stable =20
> > vs =20
> > > current. I think it=E2=80=99s useful (and I prefer the more verbose f=
orm,
> > > which isn=E2=80=99t the default). =20
> >
> > I agree that there's no reason for the default to be different, but
> > I would say that it is much easier for someone who knows that there
> > is a default to be changed to change it, than it is for someone who
> > does not. Therefore, if the information is not useful to someone
> > who does not know how to get rid of it, then it should default to
> > not being displayed, IMHO.
> > =20
>=20
> I plan on changing the default for non-INVARIANT kernels back to
> the old behavior.
>=20
> INVARIANT kernels will keep this behavior because it's a debugging
> kernel and this is one more thing to help debugging problems.
>=20

Did this ever happen? I just installed a fresh 13.1-RELEASE production
system (non-INVARIANT kernel) and it seems like SIGINFO still outputs
kernel stack information.

Cheers
Michael

--=20
Michael Gmelin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20220619140624.21263e46>