Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 20:31:55 +0300 (EEST) From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> To: will@physics.purdue.edu Cc: sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG (Maxim Sobolev), cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/led Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/editors/led/files patch-Makefile.in Message-ID: <200106071732.f57HWYj16123@vega.vega.com> In-Reply-To: <20010607121116.I85324@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> from "Will Andrews" at Jun 07, 2001 12:11:16 PM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:33:23PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev (sobomax@FreeBSD.OR= > G) wrote: > > I do not see a reason for such a strict requirement here. People want fea= > tures today, > > not N days from now (for most packages release rolling is not a very quic= > k process). I > > think that our repo is able to bear the costs involved, especially consid= > ering that > > ports Attics are being emptied regularly, so there is no cumulative effec= > t. > > What are you smoking? They have only been emptied three times in > the last 3 years that I remember! With storage prices approaching zero with increasing speed this is enough. > If the package in question isn't going to be generated before the > next release (say one week) then it definitely should be a > concern when adding patches that would be in that release, since > bento doesn't upload the packages to ftp-master more than once a > week, as far as i know. I failed to understand what you are trying to say here. Sorry. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200106071732.f57HWYj16123>