Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:10:17 +0100 From: gregoryd.freebsd@free.fr To: "Chris H." <chris#@1command.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE Available Message-ID: <1204542617.47cbdc993499b@imp.free.fr> In-Reply-To: <20080303022049.4f7srhzt7o88g4cc@webmail.1command.com> References: <1204151575.84335.3.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <1204310983.47c853c70577d@imp.free.fr> <47C89B18.8010803@infracaninophile.co.uk> <1BBD0D48B63AE41DF673F6C4@[10.110.3.211]> <1204381259.93575.15.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <20080302010048.5n293u9tic8cwww8@webmail.1command.com> <1204527716.47cba264d0240@imp.free.fr> <20080303022049.4f7srhzt7o88g4cc@webmail.1command.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting "Chris H." <chris#@1command.com>: Hi ! > In this context, I believe that it makes more sense to place the > server related install on the first disc. This makes it possible > to install a server with the least amount of effort. Granted. > It /also/ > makes it quite possible for a would-be desktop user to likely > only need to exchange discs /one/ time. As the most frequently > used desktop items will fit onto their own disc (one disc). I fully agree with that. > > Bottom line: this arrangement should ultimately make everyones > life easier, and maybe even happier. :) Sure enough. :-) cheers, gregory delfly
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1204542617.47cbdc993499b>