Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:20:28 +0000 From: "meloun-miracle-cz (Michal Meloun)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D3034: Add BUS_UNMASK_INTR method Message-ID: <f2940e42dd29a54d5e62a4362417feed@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-knxjlihey7dhpvtvtsyg-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-knxjlihey7dhpvtvtsyg-req@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
meloun-miracle-cz added a comment. With full respect, I don’t think that this new bus method is right solution for our problem(s). The proposed bus_unmask_intr() cannot be used from outside of secondary CPUs startup context. It cannot be used for SPI, it cannot be used of PPI after scheduler is started on given core. Why you cannot simply call arm_unmask_irq() directly from driver? REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3034 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: wma_semihalf.com, emaste, imp, ian, andrew, zbb Cc: freebsd-arm-list, meloun-miracle-cz, imp, andrew, emaste
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f2940e42dd29a54d5e62a4362417feed>