Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:54:20 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> To: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM> Cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>, "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steveo@eircom.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /etc/shells #include syntax support patch Message-ID: <200101290754.f0T7sKP61966@earth.backplane.com> References: <20010128101349.2c94539f.steveo@eircom.net> <20010128190227.B25222@spawn.nectar.com> <200101290453.f0T4roq13148@whizzo.transsys.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
/etc/shells is such a simple file, I don't see much of point in
polluting it. There is not much of difference having a port install:
target edit /etc/shells verses editing /usr/local/etc/shells. It
should just edit /etc/shells.
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101290754.f0T7sKP61966>