Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:55 +0200 From: Christian Brueffer <brueffer@FreeBSD.org> To: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <wkoszek@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: We don't really need two FTP daemons Message-ID: <20070510220055.GB1944@haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE> In-Reply-To: <20070510134740.GA39021@FreeBSD.czest.pl> References: <20070510134740.GA39021@FreeBSD.czest.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 01:47:40PM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > Hello, > > There is a lot of confusion caused by the fact of having two instances > of the FTP daemon present in our source tree. > > First one is src/libexed/ftpd/... > > Second one lies in src/contrib/lukemftpd/... > > We don't need to have both of them, unless one has much more powerful > functionality over the second. However, in my opinion the major purpose > of having FTP daemon in the base is possibility of fast configuration > with minimal cost, just to "get it up and running". > Yes, please. From the documentation point of view this is a nightmare. The two servers have similar manpages, partly with the same names, and it's completely non-obvious which belong to whom. One ftpd in base is plenty, thank you. - Christian -- Christian Brueffer chris@unixpages.org brueffer@FreeBSD.org GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGQ5YXbHYXjKDtmC0RAmrmAKDZq1ZrodrB/qkCIG/TAoL+9oOuVgCeNYfu F7Q3kFKvbo2fGrqeXH7jRRk= =K8oe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070510220055.GB1944>