Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:33:30 -0700 (MST) From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> To: conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de (Jan Conrad) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.5-STABLE and posix4/semaphore.h? Message-ID: <200008072033.NAA06873@freeway.dcfinc.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008071149230.24242-100000@merlin.th.physik.uni-bonn.de> from Jan Conrad at "Aug 7, 0 11:53:04 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, Chad R. Larson wrote: >> As I recall, Jan Conrad wrote: >>> sorry for asking, but is it correct that semaphore calls like >>> sem_destroy, even though defined in semaphore.h, are not implemented >>> under 3.5-STABLE? >> >> It is if you don't have >> >> options SYSVSEM >> >> in the config file you used to build your kernel. > > well - I *have* that option set Then I'll defer to the rest of the list for an answer. From looking around in /usr/src/sys/posix4 it seems someone (HD Associates) contributed POSIX scheduling as work-in-progress, with semaphores and async I/O to follow... -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.net DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200008072033.NAA06873>