Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:56:06 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH HPN Message-ID: <86twos7ns9.fsf@desk.des.no> In-Reply-To: <564309D8.7020307@freebsd.org> (Julian Elischer's message of "Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:26:48 %2B0800") References: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> <564309D8.7020307@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> writes: > The inclusion of the HPN patches meant that we could drop a custom > unsupported HPN enabled ssh from our build process. It makes ssh > actually usable. Define "usable". Does it actually make a measurable difference with the latest OpenSSH? And if HPN is so important to you, is there a reason why you can't use the port? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86twos7ns9.fsf>